A Comparıson of Musıc Educatıon Polıcıes In Türkiye and Europe
Keywords:
Music education, Education policies, Equal access, Teacher trainingAbstract
The aim of this study is to examine music education policies in Turkey and Europe from a comparative perspective, revealing the fundamental similarities and differences in the dimensions of curriculum and governance, teacher training and professional capacity, measurement and evaluation, and equal access and inclusion. The research is designed as a review study based on document analysis, a qualitative research approach. Within the scope of the study, music education curricula and related policy documents published by the Ministry of National Education in Turkey, as well as art and music education reports published by Eurydice, the European Commission, and UNESCO at the European level, were examined. The examined documents were analyzed using a descriptive and interpretive approach within the framework of the determined themes. The findings show that music education in Turkey and Europe is included in education policies for similar reasons: cultural transmission, aesthetic development, and supporting students' multifaceted learning processes. However, it is observed that the reflection of these aims in practice differs depending on governance models, teacher capacity, and resource allocation. In Turkey, while the centralized curriculum structure ensures program integrity and clarity of objectives, it is understood that the quality of implementation is largely shaped by the physical facilities of the school and the competence of the teachers. In European countries, more flexible and locally differentiated policy approaches are prominent; this allows for innovative practices, but can create differences in terms of equal access and continuity.
In conclusion, the position of music education within education policies cannot be explained solely by its inclusion in the curriculum. Strengthening teacher training and professional development opportunities, aligning measurement and evaluation approaches with pedagogical goals, and developing policy tools that support equal access are considered fundamental priorities for the sustainable and high-quality implementation of music education.
References
Akbulut, E., & Yayla, F. (2015). Müzik öğretmeni yetiştirme sürecine ilişkin sorunlar. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 1–18.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Burnard, P. (2012). Musical creativities in practice. Oxford University Press.
Burnard, P., & Murphy, R. (2017). Teaching music creatively. In P. Burnard & R. Murphy (Eds.), Teaching music creatively (pp. 1–13). Routledge.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
Eurydice. (2009). Arts and cultural education at school in Europe. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
European Commission. (2009). Arts and cultural education at school in Europe. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
European Commission. (2017). Strengthening cultural awareness and expression through education. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fautley, M. (2010). Assessment in music education. Oxford University Press.
Holden, H., & Button, S. W. (2006). The teaching of music in the primary school by the non-specialist. British Journal of Music Education, 23(1), 23–38.
Ilari, B., Helfter, S., & Huynh, T. (2020). Associations between musical participation and socioeconomic status. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(1), 1–20.
Kalyoncu, N. (2011). Türkiye’de müzik öğretmeni yetiştirme süreci. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 247–258.
Kılıç, İ., & Yıldız, E. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin müzik dersine yönelik tutumları ile akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(196), 25–40.
Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Müzik dersi öğretim programı (1–8. sınıflar). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
UNESCO. (2006). Road map for arts education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNESCO. (2010). Seoul agenda: Goals for the development of arts education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNESCO. (2024). UNESCO framework for culture and arts education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for art’s sake? The impact of arts education. OECD Publishing.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Sports, Health and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.